Showing posts with label attack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attack. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

The Tale of a Gun



Edward Archer and his attack on Officer Jesse Hartnett

The gun was a semiautomatic nine millimeter pistol, with at least a 10-round magazine, most likely a Glock 17. It had been issued to an unnamed Philadelphia police officer.

Then, in  October, 2013, the gun was stolen from the police officer’s home.


There followed a shadowy interlude of just over two years during which the gun changed hands who knows how many times, participating in who knows how much mischief. Eventually, it ended up in the possession of one Edward Archer, 30, a self-professed Islamic radical.


Archer had already shown himself to be susceptible to the siren call of a gun. In 2012, he was arrested following a domestic dispute in which Archer “pulled a small black and silver semiautomatic handgun from his waist and pointed it towards the complainant's stomach while grabbing the complainant's shirt." Arrested and charged with assault and carrying a gun without a license, the courts sentenced him to nine to 23 months, but immediately paroled him, releasing him to the streets.


In the current event, on January 7th, Archer, dressed in a traditional white Muslim robe, attempted to assassinate Philadelphia police officer Jesse Hartnett. Charging Harnett’s cruiser at point blank range, Archer fired his stolen Glock from 11 to 13 times (as various sources report). Hartnett took three shots to his left arm, was critically wounded, but heroically exited his car and gave chase, shooting and wounding Archer in the buttocks before radioing for assistance. Archer's attack was captured on video by a security camera and has been widely viewed.


Backup units sped to the scene and Archer was quickly apprehended, his smoking gun still in hand. But the question of motivation remained.


According to CNN, the suspect told investigators: "I follow Allah. I pledge my allegiance to the Islamic State and that's why I did what I did."


Philadelphia police commissioner, Richard Ross, expounded. "According to him, he believed that the police defend laws that are contrary to the teachings of the Quran."


Archer had traveled to Saudi Arabia in 2011 and Egypt in 2012. His mother, Valerie Holliday, stated that her son was a devout Muslim. Asim Abdur Rashid, the imam of Masjid Mujahideen mosque, said that Archer “was a frequent member of the masjid.”


The draw of Islamic radicalism is one theory. But Jim Kenney, the mayor of Philadelphia, assured us that this was all a ruse. “In no way shape or form does anyone in this room believe that Islam or the teaching of Islam has anything to do with what you’ve seen on the screen,” said Mayor Kenney.


“That is abhorrent. It’s just terrible and it does not represent this religion [Islam] in any way shape or form or any of its teachings,” he added. “This is a criminal with a stolen gun who tried to kill one of our officers. It has nothing to do with being a Muslim or following the Islamic faith.”


Doubling down, Kenney blamed the stolen police weapon. "There are too many guns on our streets, and I think our national government needs to do something about that."


Then the White House weighed in. Josh Earnest, the President’s press secretary, said ”Certainly one thing we can do is to keep guns out of the hands of people like him. Whether it’s somebody who planned to carry out a terrorist act or somebody who has significant mental problems shouldn’t be so easily able to get their hands on a gun.”


(Earnest, lobbying for greater background checks, apparently forgot that the weapon had originally been stolen from a police officer).


There is also the theory that Archer was mentally unstable. According the Archer’s mother, he had been hearing voices in his head. While Archer’s brother, Shane, denied that Edward was “mental,” the possibility certainly remains.


From this confusing diaspora of events and statements, we are left with three theories to explain Archer’s actions:

  1. That Archer was radicalized and performed the shooting in the name of Islam
  2. That Archer was mentally unstable and committed the act out of insanity.
  3. That the gun somehow animated Archer’s action and was the root cause of “gun violence.”


It seems that the White House and media are going with door number three. By focusing on “gun violence,” they are positing that removing guns will eliminate violence. And that “expanded background checks” will reduce the carnage.


While anything is possible, it seems that violent people will always find a way. The Murrah building, destroyed by explosives, 168 killed. A knife attack in a Chinese train station, 29 dead. For evil people, it seems that their goal is more important than their means. By focusing on “gun violence” alone, we are shortsightedly ignoring the broader evil in the human heart.


Violence is violence. Let’s concentrate on that, and the means to control it.


Sunday, February 5, 2012

Attack of the Killer Coyotes

A hungry coyote.  Photo courtesy of USDA.
We are counting our blessings in New England.  This is the mildest winter we have seen in many years.  But while we walk and jog and even play golf, luxuriating in moderate temperatures and enjoying the lack of snow, there is a grim struggle for survival going on.

The number of coyote attacks reported this winter has been rapidly escalating.  Dogs injured and killed, cats missing without a trace, and even children bitten and terrorized.  What the heck is going on?  Have coyotes suddenly turned malevolent, possessed by evil spirits?

No, the answer is far simpler, and in two parts.  First, as we have become an urban nation,  coyotes have extended their range into our suburbs while at the same time we have stopped vigorously hunting them; they have lost their fear of man.  But this is a long term trend that has played out over many decades. Of more immediate portent, they are ravenous. Slowly starving, they are driven to attack pets and children and livestock and whatever else might keep them sustained for another day.

The question begs to be answered: why? The proximate cause is an extreme lack of acorns.  In a good year (called a high mast year), a single large oak tree can produce tens of thousands of acorns.  In a low mast year, perhaps half that.  But in the autumn of 2011, there were large tracts of New England without an acorn.  Nary a one.  And that is catastrophic for mice and chipmunks and squirrels and many other direct acorn-eaters including wild turkeys, quail, and deer.  Some ecologists have estimated that up to 90% of the current rodent population could die by spring.  This puts enormous pressure on coyotes and other predators, such as foxes and weasels and hawks and owls, who must compete for that rapidly dwindling food supply.

No wonder the coyotes are famished.

But where did the acorns go?  There are multiple theories; here are two that seem most likely, especially in tandem:
  1. In the spring of 2010, we suffered extremely heavy rains and flooding.  This excessive moisture interfered with the pollination of oak flowers, the necessary precursor to acorns.
  2. The intense winter moth infestation in the autumn of 2010 caused the trees to be nearly defoliated the following spring.  This greatly stressed the oaks.
Perhaps as result of two consecutive whammies, the 2011 acorn yield was a record near-zero.  It is most likely that we will soon return to normal mast production and a recovery of the rodent population will remove pressure from coyotes and other predators.  Hard spring rains are not typically intense enough to interfere with the blooming of oaks.  And there is a new tool for winter moth control.  Cyzenis albicans, a parasitic fly imported from Europe (where winter moths originated) is showing promise in controlling moth outbreaks.

So the problem remains, how to minimize the risk of coyote attacks?  Here is a short list of ideas from the Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation:

  • Don't let coyotes intimidate you. Don't hesitate to scare or threaten coyotes with loud noises and bright lights. Don't hesitate to pick up small objects, such as a tennis ball, and throw them at the coyote. If a water hose is close at hand, spray the coyote with water in the face. Let the coyote know it is unwelcome in your area.
  • Secure your garbage. Coyotes will raid open trash materials and compost piles. Secure your garbage in tough plastic containers with tight fitting lids and keep in secure buildings when possible. Take out trash on the morning pick up is scheduled, not the previous night. Keep compost in containers designed to contain but vent the material.
  • Don't feed or try to pet coyotes. Keep wild things wild. Feeding, whether direct or indirect, can cause coyotes to act tame and over time may lead to bold behavior. Coyotes that rely on natural food items remain wild and wary of humans.
  •  Keep your pets safe. Coyotes view cats and small dogs as potential food and larger dogs as competition. For the safety of your pets, keep them restrained at all times.   
  • Eliminate availability of bird seed. Coyotes are attracted to the concentration of birds and rodents that come to feeders. If you do feed birds, clean up waste seed and spillage.
  • Ask your neighbors to follow these same steps.

Some of these may seem cruel… poor squirrels, poor birds!  Why can’t we feed them?  But remember that you are trying to save Tabby and Rover and even Junior from becoming a coyote meal.  Mother nature will return to a balance – have faith.